Daily Express Subscriber
Sign in to your account.

IN Malaysian classrooms and homes, children who struggle to sit still, complete classwork or follow instructions are often labelled as undisciplined. Lack of discipline is widely seen as a negative trait by both parents and teachers. 

Adults naturally appreciate children who follow instructions without resistance, requiring little correction or firm intervention. However, research on attention and neurodiversity suggests that behaviours interpreted as defiance or lack of effort may sometimes reflect differences in how the brain regulates focus.

When attention differences are treated as moral failure, children may internalise inadequacy rather than develop resilience. Early labelling can shape academic confidence in lasting ways.

Psychiatrists Dr Edward Hallowell and Dr John Ratey, in their book ADHD 2.0, explain that attention deficit is not simply the absence of focus but inconsistency in regulating it. Individuals may struggle in highly structured environments yet display remarkable concentration in areas that genuinely engage them. 

They can thrive in subjects or fields they love. This suggests that attention differences are not moral shortcomings but neurological patterns that require empathy, understanding and acceptance.

In schools, where classrooms are large, teachers may not be able to assess each child’s needs fully. Educators face real constraints when they spend only an hour or two per week with a class. 

Under such limitations, educators not to be blamed when they conclude that a child is inattentive, especially when most pupils can follow clear instructions while a few cannot. Surface observations, however, do not always reflect deeper realities.

At home, repeated labelling can significantly shape how children see themselves. A child who constantly hears that he or she is careless may begin to internalise that identity. Over time, what began as difficulty with attention may evolve into a limiting belief about personal ability and worth. 

In one of the cases described in ADHD 2.0, a boy who struggled with attention improved not through punishment but through targeted intervention. The approach focused on strengthening emotional security at home, establishing reassuring routines and encouraging physical activity. With support tailored to his needs, his confidence and performance improved.

This does not mean discipline is irrelevant. Structure and guidance remain essential in both schools and families. Children benefit from boundaries, consistency and clear expectations. They need to understand responsibility and that actions have consequences. 

However, discipline without understanding may produce compliance, not confidence. A child may learn to obey out of fear or pressure, yet still believe he or she is inherently incapable.

The challenge, therefore, is balance. We must nurture accountability while recognising individual differences. Not every child process information, sustains attention or responds to instruction in the same way. Then systems value uniform behavior above cognitive diversity, children who think differently risk being misunderstood. In such environments, the goal often becomes fitting in rather than growing.

When inattention is framed as a character flaw rather than understood as a cognitive pattern, children may internalise that their academic struggles reflect personal inadequacy.  Over time, this belief can weaken motivation and reduce willingness to try. What begins as a manageable difficulty may develop into long-term disengagement from learning.

As awareness of ADHD and neurodiversity grows in Malaysia, it may be time to reconsider how we interpret distraction and inconsistency. Before labelling a child as lazy or careless, we might pause to ask whether we have fully understood how that child’s mind works. 

A shift in perspective does not require abandoning discipline; it requires pairing structure with empathy. When children feel understood rather than judged, they are more likely to develop both responsibility and resilience. Beyond good grades on result sheet.

Liana Halid is a Kota Kinabalu based corporate legal officer who writes on parenting and social psychology from a personal and professional interest.

The views expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect those of the Daily Express. If you have something to share, write to us at: Forum@dailyexpress.com.my